Optimizing Hydrogen Production from Methanol Reformers by Temperature Variation and Feed Ratio Using CFD

Document Type : ACEC-2023


1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran

2 Northern Research Center for Science and Technology, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran


Steam reformers are typically utilized in hydrogen production industry, demanding pressure vessels within methanol reformer systems operating at temperatures between 250-350°C to ensure cost-effectiveness. This characteristic makes them a superior choice for fuel cell systems. However, challenges arise in enhancing hydrogen gas production efficiency while minimizing carbon monoxide emissions. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has proven effective in addressing these challenges by simulating fluid behavior. This study delves into product production, reactant consumption using CFD, and investigates changes in physical parameters of methanol reformers to optimize their performance. The research involves 140 numerical simulations that examine the relationship between feeds (steam-to-carbon) and various temperatures, aiming to understand the concurrent effect of physical parameters. The results demonstrate that increasing temperature has a more significant impact on hydrogen production compared to increasing the feed ratio. This effect is particularly notable at lower fuel ratios. For example, at a feed ratio of 1, a temperature increase of 11.4°C leads to a substantial 5.4% rise in hydrogen production. However, at a higher feed ratio (1.98), the increase in hydrogen production is only 1.9% with the same temperature increase.


Main Subjects

  1. Deb, N., Alam, M., Rahman, T., Jami, M. S., Bt Mansor, M. F. and Tajuddin, H. B. A., 2023. Design and Analysis of a Fuel Cell and Batteries in Energy Production for Electric Vehicle, Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy & Environment, 14(3), pp. 301-313. Doi:10.5829/IJEE.2023.14.03.11
  2. Mehregan, M., Sheykhi, M., Kharkeshi, B. A., Emamian, A., Aliakbari, K. and Rafiee, N., 2023. Performance analysis and optimization of combined heat and power system based on PEM fuel cell and β type Stirling engine, Energy Conversion and Management, 283, pp. 116874. Doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116874
  3. Kothari, R., Buddhi, D. and Sawhney, R., 2008. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(2), pp. 553-563. Doi:10.1016/J.RSER.2006.07.012
  4. Arzamendi, G., Diéguez, P., Montes, M., Centeno, M., Odriozola, J. and Gandía, L., 2009. Integration of methanol steam reforming and combustion in a microchannel reactor for H2 production: A CFD simulation study, Catalysis Today, 143(1-2), pp. 25-31. Doi:10.1016/J.CATTOD.2008.09.034
  5. Ribeirinha, P., Boaventura, M., Lopes, J. C. B., Sousa, J. M. and Mendes, A., 2014. Study of different designs of methanol steam reformers: Experiment and modeling, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(35), pp. 19970-19981. Doi:10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2014.10.029
  6. Klenov, O., Makarshin, L., Gribovskiy, A., Andreev, D. and Parmon, V., 2015. CFD modeling of compact methanol reformer, Chemical Engineering Journal, 282, pp. 91-100. Doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.006
  7. Ghasemzadeh, K., Andalib, E. and Basile, A., 2016. Evaluation of dense Pd–Ag membrane reactor performance during methanol steam reforming in comparison with autothermal reforming using CFD analysis, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(20), pp. 8745-8754. Doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.139
  8. Ziarati, M., Ghafouri Roozbahani, M. A. and Khandan, N., 2016. New method of rigorous modeling and CFD simulation for methanol—steam reforming in packed-bed reactors, Chemical Engineering Communications, 203(10), pp. 1359-1373. Doi:10.1080/00986445.2016.1198333
  9. Heidarzadeh, M. and Taghizadeh, M., 2017. Methanol Steam Reforming in a Spiral-Shaped Microchannel Reactor over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalyst: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation Study, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 15(4), pp. 20160205. Doi:10.1515/ijcre-2016-0205
  10. Sari, A. and Sabziani, J., 2017. Modeling and 3D-simulation of hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming in copper-coated channels of a mini reformer, Journal of Power Sources, 352, pp. 64-76. Doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.120
  11. Perng, S.-W., Horng, R.-F. and Wu, H.-W., 2017. Effect of a diffuser on performance enhancement of a cylindrical methanol steam reformer by computational fluid dynamic analysis, Applied Energy, 206, pp. 312-328. Doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.194
  12. Ngo, S. I., Lim, Y.-I., Kim, W., Seo, D. J. and Yoon, W. L., 2019. Computational fluid dynamics and experimental validation of a compact steam methane reformer for hydrogen production from natural gas, Applied Energy, 236, pp. 340-353. Doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.075
  13. Srivastava, A., Kumar, P. and Dhar, A., 2021. A numerical study on methanol steam reforming reactor utilizing engine exhaust heat for hydrogen generation, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(76), pp. 38073-38088. Doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.033
  14. Gu, R., Ding, J., Wang, Y., Yuan, Q., Wang, W. and Lu, J., 2019. Heat transfer and storage performance of steam methane reforming in tubular reactor with focused solar simulator, Applied Energy, 233, pp. 789-801. Doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.072
  15. Hunt, J., 1973. Mathematical Models of Turbulence. By BE LAUNDER and DB SPALDING. Academic Press, 1972. 169 pp.£ 2.50 or $7.50, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 57(4), pp. 826-828. Doi:10.1017/S0022112073222048
  16. Chougule, A. and Sonde, R. R., 2019. Modelling and experimental investigation of compact packed bed design of methanol steam reformer, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(57), pp. 29937-29945. Doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.166