Document Type : Technical Note


Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Environmental Design, Usumanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria


Hydrogen production from glycerol via autothermal reforming (ATR) has been widely investigated. However, little is known about the influence of impurities in glycerol on thermodynamic performance of the process. This study focused on the effects of impurities in glycerol on hydrogen productivity, energetic and exergetic efficiencies. The model of the entire process was simulated under thermoneutral condition in Aspen HYSYS using pure glycerol (PG) and crude glycerol (CG) as feeds. The two cases were optimized for maximum hydrogen production. From the optimized results, the hydrogen production per mole of the feed was 4.937 and 6.160 for the case of PG and CG, respectively. The thermal and exergetic efficiency of PG as feed were computed as 79.51% and 57.04% while that of CG were obtained to be 77.7 and 54.08%, respectively. The exergy destroyed to produce 1 mole of H2 was found to be 133.5kJ and 157.3kJ for the case of PG and CG, respectively. It could be concluded that the presence of other constituents in CG contributed to increase in hydrogen productivity by increasing the energy demand of the plant but due to increase in both energy and exergy input, they decrease both the thermal and exergetic efficiencies.


1.     Kapdan, I.K. and Kargi, F., 2006. Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 38(5), pp.569-582.
2.     Marchetti, J.M., Miguel, V.U. and Errazu, A.F., 2007. Possible methods for biodiesel production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(6), pp.1300-1311.
3.     Hu, S., Luo, X., Wan, C. and Li, Y., 2012. Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel plants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(23), pp.5915-5921.
4.     Zhang, B., Tang, X., Li, Y., Xu, Y. and Shen, W., 2007. Hydrogen production from steam reforming of ethanol and glycerol over ceria-supported metal catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(13), pp.2367-2373.
5.     Iriondo, A., Barrio, V.L., Cambra, J.F., Arias, P.L., Guemez, M.B., Sanchez-Sanchez, M.C., Navarro, R.M. and Fierro, J.L.G., 2010. Glycerol steam reforming over Ni catalysts supported on ceria and ceria-promoted alumina. International Journal of Hydrogen energy, 35(20), pp.11622-11633.
6.     Wang, H., Wang, X., Li, M., Li, S., Wang, S. and Ma, X., 2009. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from glycerol autothermal reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(14), pp.5683-5690.
7.     Wang, W., 2010. Thermodynamic analysis of glycerol partial oxidation for hydrogen production. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(11), pp.1401-1408.
8.     Kale, G.R. and Kulkarni, B.D., 2010. Thermodynamic analysis of dry autothermal reforming of glycerol. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(5), pp.520-530.
9.     “Authayanun, S., Arpornwichanop, A., Paengjuntuek, W. and Assabumrungrat, S., 2010. Thermodynamic study of hydrogen production from crude glycerol autothermal reforming for fuel cell applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(13), pp.6617-6623.
10.   Ortiz, F.G., Ollero, P. and Serrera, A., 2011. Thermodynamic analysis of the autothermal reforming of glycerol using supercritical water. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(19), pp.12186-12199.
11.   Abdulghani, A., 2014. Hydrogen Production by the Catalytic Auto-Thermal Reforming of Synthetic Crude Glycerol in a Packed Bed Tubular Reactor, Masters Thesis, University of Regina, Canada.
12.   Swami, S.M. and Abraham, M.A., 2006. Integrated catalytic process for conversion of biomass to hydrogen. Energy & Fuels, 20(6), pp.2616-2622.
13.   Adhikari, S., Fernando, S., Gwaltney, S.R., To, S.F., Bricka, R.M., Steele, P.H. and Haryanto, A., 2007. A thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(14), pp.2875-2880.
14.   Jimmy, U., Mohamedali, M. and Ibrahim, H., 2017. Thermodynamic analysis of autothermal reforming of synthetic crude glycerol (SCG) for hydrogen production. ChemEngineering, 1(4), pp.1-12.
15.   Da Silva, G.F., Mendes, J.S., Mota, F.A., Ferreira, A.L. and AN, F., 2010. Optimization of the Operating Conditions of Production Hydrogen from Glycerol Autothermal Reforming for fuel Cell. In 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Portugal, pp.1-5.
16.   Hajjaji, N., Baccar, I. and Pons, M.N., 2014. Energy and exergy analysis as tools for optimization of hydrogen production by glycerol autothermal reforming. Renewable Energy, 71, pp.368-380.
17.   Lei, J., Yue, H., Tang, H. and Liang, B., 2015. Heat integration and optimization of hydrogen production for a 1 kW low-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Chemical Engineering Science, 123, pp.81-91.
18.   “Divins, N.J., López, E., Rodríguez, Á., Vega, D. and Llorca, J., 2013. Bio-ethanol steam reforming and autothermal reforming in 3-μm channels coated with RhPd/CeO2 for hydrogen generation. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 64, pp.31-37.
19.   Doss, E.D., Kumar, R., Ahluwalia, R.K. and Krumpelt, M., 2001. Fuel processors for automotive fuel cell systems: a parametric analysis. Journal of Power Sources, 102(1-2), pp.1-15.
20.   Simpson, A.P. and Lutz, A.E., 2007. Exergy analysis of hydrogen production via steam methane reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(18), pp.4811-4820.