Document Type : Short Communication


1 Department of Energy Technology, RGPV, Bhopal, India

2 College of Engineering and Technology, Mody University of Science & Technology, Lakshmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Rajasthan), India


Due to globalization, privatization and liberalization; sugar industry has to face the domestic as well as international competition. Thus, for survival of the industry, cost effectiveness and economics of by-products become very vital. The aim of this work is to assess the potential, in the short term, for fuel ethanol production by using intermediate molasses in a sugar plant in central India. The by-product plant can support the existing plant to improve the general economy, financial viability, economic status of sugarcane growers and workers by way of paying higher prices for sugarcane crop and also create more employment opportunities in the rural areas by setting up industries based on sugarcane by-products. For assessing the amount of Ethanol production an experimental study has been carried out which find out the amount of ethanol production via fermentation process of molasses sample acquired from the plant. It gives more fine results as the quality of sugarcane changes from place to place.


1.     Jung, J.-M., S.-R., Lee, J., Lee, T., Lee, D.C.W., Tsang, E.E., Kwon, 2017. Biodiesel synthesis using chicken manure biochar and waste cooking oil. Bioresource Technology, 244: pp. 810-815.
2.     Energy Statics, Central Statistics Office Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.
3.     Castañeda-Ayarza, J.A. and L.A.B., Cortez, 2017. Final and B molasses for fuel ethanol production and some market implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70: pp.1059-1065.
4.     Dalle Ave, G. and T.A., Adams, 2018. Techno-economic comparison of Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol fermentation using various extractants. Energy Conversion and Management, 156: pp. 288-300.
5.     Van der Merwe, A.B., H., Cheng, J.F. Görgens, and J.H., Knoetze, 2013. Comparison of energy efficiency and economics of process designs for biobutanol production from sugarcane molasses. Fuel, 105: pp. 451-458.
6.     Ghosh, S.K., 2016. Biomass & bio-waste supply chain sustainability for bio-energy and bio-fuel production. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 31: pp. 31-39.
7.     Pippo, W.A. and C.A., Luengo, 2013. Sugarcane energy use: accounting of feedstock energy considering current agro-industrial trends and their feasibility. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 4(10): pp. 1-13.
 8.    Ruhul Amin, M., M. Saquib Hossain, and M., Sarker, 2013. Simulation of ethanol production by fermentation of molasses. Journal of Engineering (JOE), 1(4): pp. 69-73.
9.     Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 1993. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA.
10.   Ponce, G.H.S.F., J.M., Neto, S.S., De Jesus, J.C., De Carvalho Miranda, R., Maciel Filho, R.R. De Andrade, and M.R.W., Maciel, 2016. Sugarcane molasses fermentation with in situ gas stripping using low and moderate sugar concentrations for ethanol production: Experimental data and modeling. Biochemical engineering journal, 110: pp. 152-161.
11.   Lavarack, B.P., 2003. Estimates of ethanol production from sugar cane feedstocks. In Proceedings-Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, PK Editorial Services Pty Ltd, 25: pp. 69-77.
12.   Hamelinck, C.N., G., Van Hooijdonk, and A.P., Faaij, 2005. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass and bioenergy, 28(4): pp. 384-410.
13.   Ardila, Y.C., J.J., Figueroa, B.H., Lunelli, R., Maciel Filhoand, M.W., Maciel, 2014. Simulation of ethanol production via fermentation of the synthesis gas using aspen plus TM. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37: pp. 637-642.
14.   Gnansounou, E., and A., Dauriat, 2010. Techno-economic analysis of li ocellulosic ethanol: A review. Bioresource Technology, 13(101):
15.   Dogbe, E.S., M.A., Mandegari, and J.F., Görgens, 2018. Exergetic diagnosis and performance analysis of a typical sugar mill based on Aspen Plus® simulation of the process. Energy, 145: pp. 614-625.
16.   Ren, H.Y., F., Kong, J., Ma, L., Zhao, G.J., Xie, D., Xing, W.Q., Guo, B.F., Liu, and N.Q., Ren, 2018. Continuous energy recovery and nutrients removal from molasses wastewater by synergistic system of dark fermentation and algal culture under various fermentation types. Bioresource technology, 252: pp. 110-117.
17.   Duque, S.H., C.A., Cardona, and J., Moncada, 2015. Techno-economic and environmental analysis of ethanol production from 10 agroindustrial residues in Colombia. Energy & Fuels, 29(2): pp. 775-783.
18.   The Gazette of India: Extraordinary [Part I- Sec. I], Ministry Of Petroleum and Natural Gas Resolution, New Delhi, 3rd September, 2002 No. P-45018/28/2000-C. C.