Providing Solutions to Improve Environmental Performance of Universities Based on GreenMetric System

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Architecture, Khorasan Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran

2 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran


Today, the focus on the sustainability issue in universities has become of significance considering the climatic and environmental issues. Therefore, universities are moving toward uniting the sustainability methods in their systems. Currently, many universities in Iran are performing essential activities in relation to environmental issues. This study is to determine the share of universities in sustainability quantitatively, and then it analyzes their activities. This research evaluates their activities in two steps based on the clustering and the efficiency of their performance. In the first step, the universities are grouped into homogenous clusters based on hierarchical clustering method with regards to their activities in sustainability area. Following that, the Comparative Table is used to calculate the gained percentage in each index based on the mean of the scores of each group using the data of the year 2021. This is done to have a better understanding of the performance of each cluster and the universities priorities for becoming greener and more successful in green-metric system. By evaluating the productivity and the efficiency of the universities, this study represents the most sustainable universities in group one (as the highly sustainable) and group two (as moderately sustainable) which have achieved the maximum grade in energy, transportation, research and instructive areas. These results also show that environmental variables (including water management, waste and infrastructure management) need to be taken into account by universities.


Main Subjects

  1. Atici, K.B., Yasayacak, G., Yildiz, Y., and Ulucan, A., 2021. Green University and academic performance: An empirical study on UI GreenMetric and World University Rankings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, pp.125289. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125289
  2. Mohammad Alinezhad, F., 2020. Energy Saving through Connection of Sunken Garden with Nature and Passive Cooling in Traditional Buildings of Hot and Dry Climate of Iran. Iranian Journal of Energy and Environment, 11(1), pp.19–25. Doi: 10.5829/ijee.2020.11.01.04
  3. Alshuwaikhat, H.M., and Abubakar, I., 2008. An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), pp.1777–1785. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.002
  4. Australia/Pacific SDSN, 2017. Getting started with the SDGS in Universities: A guide to for Universities, Higher Education Institutions andthe Academic Sector, Sustainable Developement Solutions Network.
  5. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U.M., and Leal Filho, W., 2013. Sustainability Science and Education for Sustainable Development in Universities: A Way for Transition. In: Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 3–27
  6. Lauder, A., Sari, R.F., Suwartha, N., and Tjahjono, G., 2015. Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp.852–863. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.080
  7. Yuan, X., Zuo, J., and Huisingh, D., 2013. Green Universities in China - What matters? Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, pp. 36-45. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.030
  8. Aghakhani, S., Haghparast, F., & Gaspari, J., 2021. Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Low Energy-consuming Materials, Case Studies: Concrete, Brick, Wood, System Boundary: Cradle to Gate. Iranian Journal of Energy and Environment, 12(1), pp.52–60. Doi: 10.5829/IJEE.2021.12.01.07
  9. Clugston, R.M., and Calder, W., 1999. Critical dimensions of sustainability in higher education. Sustainability and University Life, 5(1), pp.31–46
  10. Marcolini, J.P., 2017. Curricula for Sustainability in Higher Education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 4(2), pp.102–104. Doi: 10.29333/ejecs/86
  11. Khan, S., and Henderson, C., 2020. How Western Michigan University is approaching its commitment to sustainability through sustainability-focused courses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, pp.119741. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119741
  12. McCowan, T., Filho, W.L., and Brandli, L. (Eds.), 2021. Universities facing Climate Change and Sustainability, Körber-Stiftung.
  13. Hazelkorn, E., 2013. World-Class Universities or World- Class Systems? Rankings and Higher Education Policy Choices. UNESCO Forum on Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education, (May), pp.1–23
  14. Tan, H., Chen, S., Shi, Q., and Wang, L., 2014. Development of green campus in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, pp.646–653. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.019
  15. Shriberg, M., 2005. Assessing Sustainability: Criteria, Tools, and Implications. In: Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 71–86
  16. Pope, J., Annandale, D., and Morrison-Saunders, A., 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), pp.595–616. Doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001
  17. Boer, P., 2013. Assessing Sustainability and Social Responsibility in Higher Education Assessment Frameworks Explained. In: Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 121–137
  18. Bautista-Puig, N., and Sanz-Casado, E., 2021. Sustainability practices in Spanish higher education institutions: An overview of status and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, pp.126320. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126320
  19. Fuentes, J.E., Garcia, C.E., and Olaya, R.A., 2021. Estimation of the Setting and Infrastructure Criterion of the UI GreenMetric Ranking Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Sustainability, 14(1), pp.46. Doi: 10.3390/su14010046
  20. Muñoz-Suárez, M., Guadalajara, N., and Osca, J.M., 2020. . Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14). Doi: 10.3390/su12145759
  21. Universitas Indonesia, 2021. GUIDELINES of UI GREENMETRIC WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKING. Computer, , pp.187–196
  22. Kuiper, F.K., and Fisher, L., 1975. 391: A Monte Carlo Comparison of Six Clustering Procedures. Biometrics, 31(3), pp.777. Doi: 10.2307/2529565
  23. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G., 2000. Pattern Classiļ¬cation
  24. Puertas, R., and Marti, L., 2019. Sustainability in Universities: DEA-GreenMetric. Sustainability, 11(14), pp.3766. Doi: 10.3390/su11143766