The Strategy of Energy Democracy and Sustainable Development: Policymakers and Instruments

Document Type : Review paper


1 Saba Power and Energy Group, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran

3 Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran


Energy democracy policymakers pay attention to planning to the formation of energy markets and exchanges of energy regions, diversification of energy resources, especially renewable resources, and global challenges due to greenhouse gas emissions. Over the introduction of concepts related to sustainable development, energy planning at the international level finds its place and goals in the direction of sustainable development, i.e., economic, social, environmental, and institutional dimensions. Energy democracy designs equations of great powers over energy with the aims of Resist, Reclaim, Restructure. This research focuses on free governments and energy democracy and the integration of priorities and methods to improve energy policy and analysis. No one policy instrument in isolation significantly impacts the energy democracy agenda. instead, all policies are essential for increasing this aim. They created new policy tools, supporting efforts to end fossil fuel dependence and connecting them to renewable energy. This research provides a starting point for improving the visibility of the energy democracy movement and constructing appropriate policies for different renewable energy transition options.


Main Subjects

  1. Harjanne, A., and Korhonen, J.M., 2019. Abandoning the concept of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 127, pp.330–340. Doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029
  2. Zhao, H., 2019. Energy Crisis. In: The Economics and Politics of China’s Energy Security Transition. Elsevier, pp 65–98.
  3. Adua, L., 2021. U.S. states initiation of energy efficiency policies in the era of climate change: Throwing a searchlight on the influence of political partisanship. Environmental Science & Policy, 115, pp.133–142. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.021
  4. Boffardi, R., Ioppolo, G., and Arbolino, R., 2021. A two-step approach to evaluate drivers and barriers to clean energy policies: Italian regional evidence. Environmental Science & Policy, 120, pp.173–186. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.006
  5. Adua, L., Clark, B., and York, R., 2021. The ineffectiveness of efficiency: The paradoxical effects of state policy on energy consumption in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, pp.101806. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101806
  6. Doggart, N., Ruhinduka, R., Meshack, C.K., Ishengoma, R.C., Morgan-Brown, T., Abdallah, J.M., Spracklen, D. V., and Sallu, S.M., 2020. The influence of energy policy on charcoal consumption in urban households in Tanzania. Energy for Sustainable Development, 57, pp.200–213. Doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.002
  7. Azadbakht, M., Esmaeilzadeh, E., and Esmaeili Shayan, M., 2015. Energy consumption during impact cutting of canola stalk as a function of moisture content and cutting height. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 14(2), pp.147–152. Doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2013.10.002
  8. Herrera, M.M., Dyner, I., and Cosenz, F., 2020. Benefits from energy policy synchronisation of Brazil’s North-Northeast interconnection. Renewable Energy, 162, pp.427–437. Doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.056
  9. Meya, J.N., and Neetzow, P., 2021. Renewable energy policies in federal government systems. Energy Economics, 101, pp.105459. Doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105459
  10. Esmaeili Shayan, M., 2020. Solar Energy and Its Purpose in Net-Zero Energy Building. In: Pérez-Fargallo A, Oropeza-Perez I (eds) Zero-energy Buildings. New approaches and technologies. IntechOpen. Doi: 10.5772/intechopen.93500
  11. García-Quevedo, J., and Jové-Llopis, E., 2021. Environmental policies and energy efficiency investments. An industry-level analysis. Energy Policy, 156, pp.112461. Doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112461
  12. Xin-gang, Z., Xin, M., Ying, Z., and Pei-ling, L., 2020. Policy inducement effect in energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of China. Energy, 211, pp.118726. Doi: 10.1016/
  13. Brummer, V., 2018. Of expertise, social capital, and democracy: Assessing the organizational governance and decision-making in German Renewable Energy Cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, pp.111–121.
    Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.039
  14. Hess, D.J., 2018. Energy democracy and social movements: A multi-coalition perspective on the politics of sustainability transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, pp.177–189. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.003
  15. Esmaeili Shayan, M., Najafi, G., Ghobadian, B., Gorjian, S., and Mazlan, M., 2022. Sustainable Design of a Near-Zero-Emissions Building Assisted by a Smart Hybrid Renewable Microgrid. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development; 11(2), pp.471-480. Doi: 10.14710/ijred.2022.43838.
  16. Komendantova, N., Riegler, M., and Neumueller, S., 2018. Of transitions and models: Community engagement, democracy, and empowerment in the Austrian energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 39, pp.141–151. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.031
  17. Chaiyapa, W., Hartley, K., and del Barrio Alvarez, D., 2021. From end-users to policy designers: Breaking open the black box of energy technocracy in Thailand. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, pp.101912. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101912
  18. Qudrat-Ullah, H., 2022. A review and analysis of renewable energy policies and CO2 emissions of Pakistan. Energy, 238, pp.121849. Doi: 10.1016/
  19. Dialga, I., 2021. Evaluating Normandy’s sustainable development and energy transition policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, pp.127096. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127096
  20. Zhao, Y., Shi, Q., Li, H., Qian, Z., Zheng, L., Wang, S., and He, Y., 2022. Simulating the economic and environmental effects of integrated policies in energy-carbon-water nexus of China. Energy, 238, pp.121783. Doi: 10.1016/
  21. Esmaeili shayan, M., Najafi, G., Gorjian, S., 2020. Design Principles and Applications of Solar Power Systems. First Edit. Tehran: ACECR Publication- Amirkabir University of Technology Branch. (In Persian)
  22. Mullally, G., Dunphy, N., and O’Connor, P., 2018. Participative environmental policy integration in the Irish energy sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 83, pp.71–78. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.007
  23. Azadbakht, M., Shayan, M. E., Jafari, H., Ghajarjazi, E., and Kiapei, A., 2014. Factor Resistance Comparison of a Long Shaft in 955 and 1055 John Deere Grain Combine, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial and Mechatronics Engineering, 8(12), pp. 2058-2063. Doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1100909
  24. Hardie, L., Smith Devetak, N., and Rifkin, W., 2016. Universities in contentious energy debates—Science, democracy and coal seam gas in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science, 20, pp.105–116. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.008
  25. Bergougui, B., and Murshed, S.M., 2020. New evidence on the oil-democracy nexus utilising the Varieties of Democracy data. Resources Policy, 69, pp.101905. Doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101905
  26. Tsagkari, M., Roca, J., and Kallis, G., 2021. “From local island energy to degrowth? Exploring democracy, self-sufficiency, and renewable energy production in Greece and Spain.” Energy Research & Social Science, 81, pp.102288. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102288
  27. Noboa, E., and Upham, P., 2018. Energy policy and transdisciplinary transition management arenas in illiberal democracies: A conceptual framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, pp.114–124. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.014
  28. Royston, S., and Foulds, C., 2021. The making of energy evidence: How exclusions of Social Sciences and Humanities are reproduced (and what researchers can do about it). Energy Research & Social Science, 77, pp.102084. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102084
  29. Esmaeili Shayan, M., Najafi, G. and Ghasemzadeh, F., 2020. Advanced study of the parabolic trough collector using aluminum (III) oxide. International Journal of Smart Grid, 4(3), pp.111-116. Doi: 10.20508/ijsmartgrid.v4i3.108.g98
  30. Hess, D.J., 2019. Coalitions, framing, and the politics of energy transitions: Local democracy and community choice in California. Energy Research & Social Science, 50, pp.38–50. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.013
  31. Thombs, R.P., 2019. When democracy meets energy transitions: A typology of social power and energy system scale. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, pp.159–168. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.020
  32. Canfield, C., Klima, K., and Dawson, T., 2015. Using deliberative democracy to identify energy policy priorities in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, pp.184–189. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.008
  33. Johnstone, P., and Stirling, A., 2020. Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: From regimes to democracies in sociotechnical transitions and discontinuities. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, pp.101245. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101245
  34. Davidson, D.J., Edou, E.A., and Robinson, B., 2018. Chipping away at democracy: Legislative slippage in Alberta’s energy development zone. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, pp.303–310. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.003
  35. Hoicka, C.E., Lowitzsch, J., Brisbois, M.C., Kumar, A., and Ramirez Camargo, L., 2021. Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities. Energy Policy, 156, pp.112435. Doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112435
  36. Blumer, Y.B., Braunreiter, L., Kachi, A., Lordan-Perret, R., and Oeri, F., 2018. A two-level analysis of public support: Exploring the role of beliefs in opinions about the Swiss energy strategy. Energy Research & Social Science, 43, pp.109–118. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.024
  37. Campos, I., and Marín-González, E., 2020. People in transitions: Energy citizenship, prosumerism and social movements in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, pp.101718. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101718
  38. Thomas, A., and Erickson, J.D., 2021. Rethinking the geography of energy transitions: low carbon energy pathways through energyshed design. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, pp.101941. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101941
  39. Lennon, M., 2021. Energy transitions in a time of intersecting precarities: From reductive environmentalism to antiracist praxis. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, pp.101930. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101930
  40. Aklin, M., 2021. The off-grid catch-22: Effective institutions as a prerequisite for the global deployment of distributed renewable power. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, pp.101830. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101830
  41. Neumann, A., Sorge, L., von Hirschhausen, C., and Wealer, B., 2020. Democratic quality and nuclear power: Reviewing the global determinants for the introduction of nuclear energy in 166 countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 63, pp.101389. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101389
  42. Coy, D., Malekpour, S., Saeri, A.K., and Dargaville, R., 2021. Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, pp.101871. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101871
  43. Stančík, A., Osička, J., and Overland, I., 2021. Villain or victim? Framing strategies and legitimation practices in the Russian perspective on the European Union’s Third Energy Package. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, pp.101962. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101962
  44. Pesch, U., 2019. Elusive publics in energy projects: The politics of localness and energy democracy. Energy Research & Social Science, 56, pp.101225. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101225
  45. Yang, S., and Park, S., 2020. The effects of renewable energy financial incentive policy and democratic governance on renewable energy aid effectiveness. Energy Policy, 145, pp.111682. Doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111682
  46. Obydenkova, A. V., and Salahodjaev, R., 2017. Climate change policies: The role of democracy and social cognitive capital. Environmental Research, 157, pp.182–189. Doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.009
  47. Wagner, A., Grobelski, T., and Harembski, M., 2016. Is energy policy a public issue? Nuclear power in Poland and implications for energy transitions in Central and East Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, pp.158–169. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.010
  48. Berry, D., 2020. Designing innovative clean energy programs: Transforming organizational strategies for a low-carbon transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 67, pp.101545. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101545
  49. Hess, D.J., 2019. Cooler coalitions for a warmer planet: A review of political strategies for accelerating energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, pp.101246. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101246
  50. Aunphattanasilp, C., 2019. Civil society coalitions, power relations, and socio-political ideas: Discourse creation and redesigning energy policies and actor networks in Thailand. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, pp.101271. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101271
  51. Park, S., and Yun, S.-J., 2021. Multiscalar energy transitions: Exploring the strategies of renewable energy cooperatives in South Korea. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, pp.102280. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102280
  52. Vajjarapu, H., and Verma, A., 2021. Composite adaptability index to evaluate climate change adaptation policies for urban transport. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 58, pp.102205. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102205
  53. Esmaeili Shayan, M., Najafi, G. and Lorenzini, G., 2022. Phase change material mixed with chloride salt graphite foam infiltration for latent heat storage applications at higher temperatures and pressures. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, pp.1-11. Doi: 10.1007/s40095-021-00462-5
  54. Grossmann, K., Jiglau, G., Dubois, U., Sinea, A., Martín-Consuegra, F., Dereniowska, M., Franke, R., Guyet, R., Horta, A., Katman, F., Papamikrouli, L., Castaño-Rosa, R., Sandmann, L., Stojilovska, A., and Varo, A., 2021. The critical role of trust in experiencing and coping with energy poverty: Evidence from across Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 76, pp.102064. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102064
  55. Esmaeili Shayan, M. and Hojati, J., 2021. Floating Solar Power Plants: A Way to Improve Environmental and Operational Flexibility. Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy and Environment, 12(4), pp.337-348. Doi: 10.5829/ijee.2021.12.04.07
  56. Hughes, K.A., Convey, P., and Turner, J., 2021. Developing resilience to climate change impacts in Antarctica: An evaluation of Antarctic Treaty System protected area policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 124, pp.12–22. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.023
  57. Hess, D.J., McKane, R.G., and Belletto, K., 2021. Advocating a just transition in Appalachia: Civil society and industrial change in a carbon-intensive region. Energy Research & Social Science, 75, pp.102004. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102004
  58. Esmaeili Shayan, M., Najafi, G., Ghobadian, B. and Gorjian, S., 2022. Modeling the Performance of Amorphous Silicon in Different Typologies of Curved Building-integrated Photovoltaic Conditions. Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy and Environment, 13(1), pp.87-97. Doi: 10.5829/ijee.2022.13.01.10
  59. Esmaeili Shayan, M., Esmaeili Shayan, S. and Nazari, A., 2021. Possibility of supplying energy to border villages by solar energy sources. Energy Equipment and Systems, 9(3), pp.279-289. Doi: 10.22059/EES.2021.246079
  60. Ghasemzadeh, F., Esmaeilzadeh, M. and Shayan, M., 2020. Photovoltaic Temperature Challenges and Bismuthene Monolayer Properties. International Journal of Smart Grid-ijSmartGrid, 4(4), pp.190-195. Retrieved from
  61. Esmaeili Shayan, M., Najafi, G. and Nazari, A., 2021. The Biomass Supply Chain Network Auto-Regressive Moving Average Algorithm. International Journal of Smart Grid-ijSmartGrid, 5(1), pp.15-22. article/download/153/pdf
  62. Azadbakht, M., Esmaeili Shayan, M., and Jafari, H., 2013. Investigation of Long Shaft Failure in John Deere 955 Grain Combine Harvester under Static Load. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(3), pp.70-73. Doi: 10.13189/ujar.2013.010305
  63. Esmaeili Shayan, M., and Ghasemzadeh, F., 2020. Nuclear Power Plant or Solar Power Plant. In: Awwad N (ed) Nuclear Power Plants - The Processes from the Cradle to the Grave. IntechOpen, Landon.
  64. Douenne, T., and Fabre, A., 2020. French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecological Economics, 169, pp.106496. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106496
  65. Ghasemzadeh, F., and Esmaeili Shayan, M. 2020. Nanotechnology in the Service of Solar Energy Systems. In Nanotechnology and the Environment. London: IntechOpen.
  66. Esameili Shayan, M. and Najafi, G., 2021. Design of an Integrated Photovoltaic Site: Case of Isfahan's Jarghouyeh photovoltaic plant. Journal of Energy Planning And Policy Research, 6(4), pp.229-250.
  67. Esmaeili, M.S. and Najafi, G., 2019. Energy-economic optimization of thin layer photovoltaic on domes and cylindrical towers. International Journal of Smart Grid-ijSmartGrid, 3(2), pp.84-91.
  68. Yeganeh, A.J., McCoy, A.P., and Schenk, T., 2020. Determinants of climate change policy adoption: A meta-analysis. Urban Climate, 31, pp.100547. Doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100547
  69. Garland, S., 2021. EU policy must change to reflect the potential of gene editing for addressing climate change. Global Food Security, 28, pp.100496. Doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100496
  70. Hughes, S., 2020. Principles, drivers, and policy tools for just climate change adaptation in legacy cities. Environmental Science & Policy, 111, pp.35–41. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.007
  71. Esmaeili shayan, M., Najafi, G., and Banakar, A. ahmad, 2017. Power Quality in Flexible Photovoltaic System on Curved Surfaces. Journal of Energy Planning And Policy Research, 3(17), pp.105–136
  72. Gil, L., 2016. Research on materials and renewable energy. Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais, 28(2), pp.124–129. Doi: 10.1016/j.ctmat.2017.02.003
  73. Vanegas Cantarero, M.M., 2020. Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: A roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, pp.101716. Doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101716