Mechanical Engineering Design Theory Framework for Solar Desalination Processes: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Document Type: Review paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Engineering.Center for CAD / CAM Studies. University of Holguin, Cuba

2 School of Systems of Torreon. Autonomous University of Coahuila, Mexico

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to assess theoretical and practical analysis of scientific publications on solar desalination. This analysis is proposed within mechanical design theory framework. For this, inductive and statistical methods were used in analysis of the scientific publications of different specialties that deal with the design process of solar desalination. With the use of the mentioned methods a tendency was obtained that justifies applying the study results to this type of devices of the approaches of the theory of the mechanical design analyzed. Statistical analysis is conducted for the above assessment not only analytically but quantitatively. This gives responses to problems currently posed by different authors related to the possibility of linking several disciplines used today in isolation for the application of mechanical design theory to this type of solar desalination.

Keywords


  1. Parekh, S., et al., 2004. Solar desalination with a humidification-dehumidification technique - a comprehensive technical review. Desalination, 160(2): 167-186.
  2. Farid, M. and Al-Hajaj, A.W., 1999. Solar desalination with a humidification-dehumidification cycle. Desalination, 106(1-3: 427-429.
  3. Al-Hallaj, S., et al., 2005. Solar desalination with humidification - dehumidification cycle: Review of economics. Desalination, 195(1-3): 169–186.
  4. Moumouh, J., Tahiri, M. and Salouhi, M., 2014. Solar thermal energy combined with humidification-dehumidification process for desalination brackish water: Technical review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(27: 15232-15237.
  5. Kouhikamali, R. and M. Hassani, 2014. The Possibility of using Flat Plate Solar Collector Based on the Best Calculated Tilt Angle in the City of Rasht as a Case Study. International Journal of Engineering (IJE), TRANSACTIONS B: Applications, 27(8): 1297-1306.
  6. Hashemi, H., et al., 2014. Fixture Design Automation and Optimization Techniques: Review and Future Trends. International Journal of Engineering (IJE), TRANSACTIONS B: Applications, 27(11): 1787-1794.
  7. Veza, J.M. and Ruiz, V., 1993. Solar Distillation in Forced Convection. Simulation and Experience. Renewable Energy, 3(6/7): 691-699.
  8. Kirschman, C.F. and Fadel, G.M., 1998. Classifying Functions for Mechanical Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, (120(3):  475-482.
  9. Altshuller, G.S., 1999. The Innovation Algorithm. TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. WORCESTER, MA: TECHNICAL INNOVATION CENTER, INC.
  10. Caraux, G. and Pinloche, S., 2005. PermutMatrix: a graphical environment to arrange gene expression profiles in optimal linear order. Bioinformatic Applications, 21(7): 1280–1281.
  11. Ward Jr. J.H., 1963. Hierarchial Grouping to Optimize Objective Function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301): 236-244.
  12. Finger, S. and Dixon, J.R., 1989. A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part I: Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Computer-Based Models of Design Processes. Research in Mechanical Engineering Design, 1(1): 51-67.
  13. Finger, S. and Dixon, J.R., 1989. A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part II. Representations, Analysis, and Design for the Life Cycle. Research in Mechanical Engineering Design, 1(2): 121-137.
  14. Fey, V.R., Rivin, E.I., and Vertkin, I.M., 1994. Application of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving to Design and Manufacturing Systems. Annals of the ClRP, 43(1): 107–110.
  15. Song-Kyoo, K., 2012. Conceptual Design Based on Substance-Field Model in Theory of Inventive Problem Solving International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4): 306-309.
  16. Cavallucci, D. and R.D., 2001. Weill, Integrating Altshuller's development laws for technical systems into the design process. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 50(1): 115–120.
  17. Ashrafizadeh, S.A. and M. Amidpour, 2012. Exergy analysis of humidification–dehumidification desalination systems using driving forces concept. Desalination, 285: 108–116.
  18. Mistry, K.H., J.H. Lienhard V, and S.M. Zubair,2010.  Effect of entropy generation on the performance of humidification-dehumidification desalination cycles.International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 49(9): 1837-1847.
  19. Mistry, K.H., A. Mitsos, and J.H. Lienhard V, 2011. Optimal operating conditions and configurations for humidification e dehumidification desalination cycles. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 50(5): 779-789.
  20. Narayan, G.P., et al., 2013. Thermodynamic balancing of the humidification dehumidification desalination system by mass extraction and injection. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 57(2): 756–770.
  21. Jubran, B.A., Ahmed, M. I, Ismail, A. F and Abakr, Y. A, 2000. Numerical modelling of a multi-stage Solar Still. Energy Conversion and Management, 41(11): 1107-1121.
  22. Jaluria, Y., 2008. Design and Optimization of Thermal Systems (Second Edition). Taylor & Francis Group.
  23. Krishnan, V. and Ulrich, K.T. 2001. Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature. Management Science, 47(1): 1 – 21.
  24. Anjos, G., et al., 2013. Heat Transfer Engineering: 3D ALE Finite Element Method for Two-Phase Flows with Phase Change. Heat Transfer Engineering, 35(5): 537-547.
  25. Hughes, T. and Franca, L.P., 1987. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VII. The stokes problem with various well-posed boundary conditions: Symmetric formulations that converge for all velocity/pressure spaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 65(1): 85-96.
  26. Hughes, T., Franca, L.P., and M. Balestra, 1986. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the babuška-brezzi condition: a stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of the stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 59(1): 85-99.
  27. Hughes, T., Franca, L.P. and G.M. Hulbert, 1989. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VIII. The galerkin/least-squares method for advective-diffusive equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 73(2): 173-189.
  28. Hughes, T., Franca, L.P. and M. Mallet, 1986. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: I. Symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 54(2): 223-234.
  29. Hughes, T., Franca, L.P. and M. Mallet, 1987. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VI. Convergence analysis of the generalized SUPG formulation for linear time-dependent multidimensional advective-diffusive systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 63(1): 97-112.
  30. Hughes, T.. and Johan, Z., 1991. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: X. The compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 89(1-3): 141-219.
  31. Hughes, T.. and Mallet, M., 1986. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: III. The generalized streamline operator for multidimensional advective-diffusive systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 58(3): 305-328.
  32. Hughes, T. and Mallet, M., 1986. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: IV. A discontinuity-capturing operator for multidimensional advective-diffusive systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 58(3): 329-336.
  33. Hughes, T., Mallet, M., and Akira, M., 1986. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: II. Beyond SUPG. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 54(3): 341-355.
  34. Shakib, F. and Hughes, T., 1991. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: IX. Fourier analysis of space-time Galerkin/least-squares algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 87(1): 35-58.
  35. Razzaqa, M., et al., 2011. FEM multigrid techniques for fluid–structure interaction with application to hemodynamics. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 62: 1156–1170.
  36. Hsu, W. and Woon, I.M.Y., 1998. Current research in the conceptual design of mechanical products. Computer-Aided Design, 30(5): 377-389.
  37. Hirtz, J., et al., 2002. A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts. Research in Engineering Design, 13(2): 65-82.
  38. Jose, A. and Tollenaere, M., 2004. Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16(3):  371–390.
  39. Li, W.D., et al., 2004. Feature-based design in a distributed and collaborative environment. Computer-Aided Design, 36(9): 775–797.
  40. Petrick, I.J. and Echols, A.E., 2004. Technology roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2): 81-100.
  41. Ashby, M.F., 2000. Material Selection in Mechanical Design. Cambrige: Butterworth Heinemann.
  42. Nawayseh, N.K., et al., 1997. A simulation study to improve the performance of a solar constructed in Jordan. Desalination, 109(3): 277-284.
  43. Al-Hallaj, S., Farid, M.M. and Tamimi, A.R., 1998. Solar desalination with a humidification-dehumidification cycle: performance of the unit. Desalination, 120(3): 273-280.
  44. Nafey, A.S., et al., 2004. Solar desalination using humidification dehumidification processes. Part I. A numerical investigation. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(7-8): 1243–1261.
  45. Nafey, A.S., et al., 2004. Solar desalination using humidification–dehumidification processes.Part II. An experimental investigation. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(7-8): 1263–1277.
  46. Ettouney, H., 2005. Design and analysis of humidification dehumidification desalination process. Desalination, 183(1-3): 341–352.
  47. Xiong, R.H., et al., 2005. Experimental investigation of a baffled shell and tube desalination column using the humidification-dehumidification process. Desalination,  180(1-3): 253-261.
  48. Zamen, M., Amidpourb, M. and Soufari, S.M., 2009. Cost optimization of a solar humidification–dehumidification desalination unit using mathematical programming. Desalination, 239(1-3): 92-99.
  49. Zamen, M., et al., 2014. Experimental investigation of a two-stage solar humidification–dehumidification desalination process. Desalination, 332(1): 1-6.
  50. Farsad, S. and Behzadmehr, A., 2011. Analysis of a solar desalination unit with humidification–dehumidification cycle using DoE method. Desalination, 278(1-3): 70-76.
  51. Summers, E.K., M.A. Antar, and J.H. Lienhard V, 2012. Design and optimization of an air heating solar collector with integrated phase change material energy storage for use in humidification-dehumidification desalination. Solar Energy, 86(11): 3417-3429.
  52. Eslamimanesh, A. and Hatamipour, M.S., 2009. Mathematical modeling of a direct contact humidification–dehumidification desalination process. Desalination, 237(1-3): 296–304.
  53. Xiong, R., Wang, S. and Wang, Z., 2006. A mathematical model for a thermally coupled humidification–dehumidification desalination process. Desalination, 196(1-3): 177–187.
  54. Bhujangrao, K.H., 2016. Design and Development of Cylindrical Parabolic Collector for Hot Water Generation. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 7(1): 1-6.
  55. Rezaei, M., et al., 2013. The Role of Renewable Energies in Sustainable Development: Case Study Iran. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment4(4): 320-329.