Characterization and Transformation of Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles in Aqueous Suspensions: Influence of pH

Authors

School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Malaysia

Abstract

Silicon dioxide (SiO2) in nanoscale had been detected as waste product in river water for the past two decades and it is recently proven to have adverse effects toward human and animal health, the ecosystem and water treatment system. The removal of SiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) from water still remains a challenge due to its small size and unknown interactions within the water body. In this study, dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique was applied to characterize SiO2 in terms of surface charge and particle size as a function of pH within the range of 2 to 11 to analyze the aggregation behavior and significance of the intermolacular interactions in deionized (DI) water and tap water. DLS analysis identified both pH values of the point of zero charge (pHPZC) of SiO2 NPs in DI water and tap water at pH 3.2 and pH 2.8 respectively. The initial pH was discovered at 7.1 in tap water with a mean particle size of 346 nm and an average surface charge value of -27 mV compared to initial pH of DI water which was 5.4 with mean particle size of 295 nm and an average surface charge value of -33 mV. It was found that both in DI water and tap water, SiO2 NPs aggregated and increased in particle size but reduced in surface charge when pH slowly decreased towards their respective pHPZC from the initial pH by adding 0.25M of hydrochloric acid. The mean particle size at pHPZC in DI water is measured at 1750 nm larger compared to the mean particle size in tap water indicating that the presence of other ions in tap water suppressed the aggregation process. In conclusion, results suggests that pH does influence the surface charge of SiO2 NPs and affect the stability behavior and  its interaction processes in aqueous suspensions.

Keywords


M. Bizi, 2012. Stability and flocculation of nanosilica by conventional organic polymer. Natural Science, 4: 372–385.
Chan, Y., Kuan, W., Tzou, Y., Chen, T., Liu, Y., Wang, M., and H. Teah, 2016. Molecular Structures of Al/Si and Fe/Si Coprecipitates and the Implication for Selenite Removal. Sci. Rep., 6: 24716.
Chang, M. R., Lee, D. J., and J. Y. Lai, 2007. Nanoparticles in wastewater from a science-based industrial park — Coagulation using polyaluminum chloride. Journal of Environmental Management, 85: 1009–1014.
C. G. Daughton, 2004. Non-regulated water contaminants : emerging research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24: 711–732.
Demadis, K. D., Ketsetzi, A., and E. Sarigiannidou, E, 2012. Catalytic effect of magnesium ions on silicic acid polycondensation and inhibition strategies based on chelation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51: 9032−9040.
Duan, J., and J. Gregory, 2003. Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 102: 475–502.
Duan, J., Yu, Y., Shi, H., Tian, L., Guo, C., Huang, P., Zhou, X., Peng, S., and Z. Sun, 2013. Toxic effects of silica nanoparticles on zebrafish embryos and larvae, PLoS ONE 8(9): 4–12.
Fidalgo, A., Emı, M., and L. M. Ilharco, 2003. Chemical Control of Highly Porous Silica Xerogels : Physical Properties and Morphology, Chem. Mater. 15: 2186–2192.
R. K. Iler,1979. Chemistry of silica solubility, polymerization, colloid and surface properties, and biochemistry, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, Canada, 11,563.
Kravchenko, A. A., Demianenko, E. M., Tsendra, O. M., Lobanov, V. V, Grebenyuk, A. G., and M. I. Terets, 2015. Simulation of the interaction between silica surface and acid or alkaline aqueous media. Поверхность, 7(3):  36–41.
Liu, Y., Tourbin, M., Lachaize, S., and P. Guiraud, 2012. Silica nanoparticle separation from water by aggregation with AlCl3. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51: 1853–1863.
Liu, Y., Tourbin, M., Lachaize, S., and P. Guiraud, 2013. Silica nanoparticles separation from water : Aggregation by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Chemosphere, 92: 681–687.
M. N. Moore, 2006. Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment ?. Environment International, 32: 967–976.
Omar, F. M., Aziz, H. A., and S. Stoll, 2014. Nanoparticle properties , behavior , fate in aquatic systems and ucharacterization methods. Journal of Colloid Science and Biotechnology, 3(1): 1–10.
Petosa, A. R., Jaisi, D. E. B. P., Quevedo, I. R., and M. Elimelech, 2010. Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments : role of physicochemical interactions. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(17): 6532–6549.
L.Reijnders, 2006. Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufactured nanoparticles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14: 124–133.
Saad, B., Pok, F. W., Ngilmi, A., Sujari, A., and M. I. Saleh, 1998. Analysis of anions and cations in drinking water samples by Capillary Ion Analysis,Food Chemistry, 61(1): 2–7.
Shamsi, A., Ahmed, A., and B. Bano, 2017. Structural transition of kidney cystatin induced by silicon dioxide nanoparticles : An implication for renal diseases. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 94: 754–761.
T. Tarutani, 1989. A Review of Silicic Acid. Analytical Sciences, 5: 242–252.
H. Wang, 2006. Preparation and morphology of SiO2/PMMA nanohybrids by microemulsion polymerization. Colloid Polym Sci, 284: 755–762.
Yang, Y., Faust, J. J., Schoepf, J., Hristovski, K., Capco, D. G., Herckes, P., and P. Westerhoff, 2016. Survey of food-grade silica dioxide nanomaterial occurrence, characterization , human gut impacts and fate across its lifecycle. Science of the Total Environment, 565: 902–912.
Yu, W., Xu, L., Graham, N., and J. Qu, 2015. Contribution of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to the fouling of ultrafiltration with coagulation pre-treatment. Sci. Rep. 5, 13067.
Zhang, T. C., Rao, S., and K. C. K. Lai, 2009. Fate and transport of nanomaterials in aquatic plant. In Chapter 15, Nanotechnologies for Water Environment Applications: 474–476.
Zhihua, W., Jinxiu, W., and D. Nan, 2010. Study and application on removal of silica by produced water reused in boiler. IEEE: 1–4.