Biogas Production through Anaerobic Digestion of Tannery Solid Waste

Authors

1 Institute of Leather Engineering and Technology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1209, Bangladesh+Institute of Energy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

2 Leather Research Institute, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Savar, Dhaka-1350, Bangladesh

3 Institute of Energy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

4 Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

5 Water Technology, Norwegian university of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1432 Aas, Norway

Abstract

Annually about 85,000 tons of raw hides and skins are estimated to be processed for leather production in Bangladesh. Tannery generates huge amount of solid and liquid wastes. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a potential treatment to stabilize waste and produce biogas for renewable energy. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of AD of tannery solid waste (TSW) generated from the pre-tanning operation and to compare the effect of cow dung as the substrate to TSW. For the reaction with TSW by mixing with different substrates, biogas production was observed starting on 4th day with a steady increase. The cumulative gas production from each of the test reactors operating at the various organic loading of tannery solid waste, domestic sewage, and cow dung were different. This study shows an optimal AD process of TSW by mixing with different substrates for the obtained optimum C/N ratio and also for the high volatile solids (VS). The COD removal rates for the series of 5 reactors (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) were 48.75, 50.84, 46.07, 45.94 and 47.78% respectively. Maximum COD removal was achieved from reactor R2 where maximum gas was also produced.

Keywords

References

  1. Export Promotion Bureau report 2015, Bangladesh
  2. Nemec D (2010), Solid waste management options for tannery estate Dhaka, UNIDO technical paper, EE/BGD/09/001 & EE/BGD/09/A01 & XP/BGD/09/002
  3. Thangamani A, Rajakumar S and Ramanujam RA 2009, Anaerobic co-digestion of hazardous tannery solid waste and primary sludge: biodegradation kinetics and metabolite analysis, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 12: 517-524
  4. Paul, H. L., Antunes, A. P. M., Covington, A. D., Evans, P., & Phillips, P. S. 2013. Bangladeshi leather industry: an overview of recent sustainable developments. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists, 97(1), 25-32.
  5. Oyeleke S. B. and Gweba C., 2011. Comparative analysis of biogas produce from tannery effluent and groundnut waste, International Research of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (ISSN 2251-0176) Vol. 1(10) pp. 250-253,
  6. Kanagaraj. J., Velappan. K.C., Chandra Babu N.K., and Saddula S., Solid waste generation in the leather industry and its utilization for cleaner environment – A Review. Technical report, Central leather research institute, Adyar, Chennai, 2006.
  7. Cirne F, Donodo G and Tombetti F 1982, Anaerobic digestion of tannery wastes, Agriculture Wastes, 4(3): 241-243
  8. Seadi AT, Rutz D, Prassl H, Köttner M, Finsterwalder T, Volk S and Janssen R 2008, Biogas Handbook, University ofSouthern Denmark, p. 21-23.
  9. Rahman MH and Muyeed A 2010, Solid and Hazardous waste management, 1st Ed., ITN-BUET, Dhaka, Bangladesh, p.179-214
  10. Dublin D and Steinhauser A 2008, Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources, Wiley-VCH, Verlag, Weinheim, Germany
  11. Cirne DG, Paloumet X, Björnsson L, Alves MM and Mattiasson B 2007, Anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste – effects of lipid concentration, Renewable Energy, 32: 965–975
  12. Oliveira S 2004, Formaldehyde degradation in an anaerobicpacked-bed bioreactor, Water Res, 38: 1685-1694
  13. Shanmugam P. and Horan N.J. Optimizing the biogasproduction from leather fleshing waste by co-digestionwith MSW. Master’s thesis, Environmental Engineering,School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, UK, 2009.
  14. Matthieu Girard et al., Biodegradation in Animal Manure Management, in Biodegradation - Engineering and Technology, edited by Rolando Chamy, InTech, 2013, Chapter 10.
  15. APHA, AWWA, and WEF 1992, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (18th Ed.), American Public Health Assn, Washington DC
  16. Jawed M, Tare V. 1996, Methanogenic activity andperformance of UASB, DSFF and USFF reactors. WaterSci. Technol,34: 483–487
  17. Thermo Scientific FLASH 2000 HT Elemental Analyzer for Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry
  18. Thermo Scientific Trace GC Ultra Gas Chromatography, Maintenance, and Troubleshooting Manual; PIN 31709180, Revision march 2011
Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy & Environment
Volume 8, Issue 3
Summer 2017
Pages 210-215

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics