Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria

2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

3 Environmental Engineering and Management Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

4 Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Abstract

Statistical modelling was employed to analyze the effect of sorbate-sorbent interphase on the adsorption of pesticides and herbicides from aqueous media. The dataset used for this study was sourced from relevant and reputable published papers in the past five years. Sixty-six lines of data were analyzed using response surface methodology (RSM) and historical data design (HDD) on Design expert. Five parameters were considered in the study: adsorbate’s relative molecular mass (RMM), adsorbent specific surface area (SBET), adsorbent effective surface area eSBET (i.e., the portion of the SBET occupied by the sorbate molecules), the water solubility of adsorbate, and adsorbate preferential adsorption (i.e., the ratio of the amount of sorbate on the sorbent to the amount in solution). From the analysis of variance, it was observed that the SBET of the adsorbent was the most significant determining for the adsorption capacity, q (at a significance level of p <0.05). Other significant factors were the RMM, eSBET, and the preferential adsorption. Generally, solubility did not show any significant influence on the q. The response surface model had an R2 value of 0.9945 and an adjusted R2 value of 0.9927. Conclusively, the q of an adsorbent towards an herbicide or a pesticide increases with increasing eSBET and SBET, irrespective of the sorbate’s solubility and molecular mass.

Keywords

1.    Khoshnood, M., & Azizian, S., 2012, Adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid pesticide by graphitic carbon nanostructures prepared from biomasses, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 18(5): 1796–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.04.007
2.    Bezerra, C. de O., Cusioli, L. F., Quesada, H. B., Nishi, L., Mantovani, D., Vieira, M. F., & Bergamasco, R., 2020, Assessment of the use of Moringa oleifera seed husks for removal of pesticide diuron from contaminated water, Environmental Technology, 41(2): 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1493148
3.    Cusioli, L. F., Bezerra, C. de O., Quesada, H. B., Alves Baptista, A. T., Nishi, L., Vieira, M. F., & Bergamasco, R., 2019, Modified Moringa oleifera Lam. Seed husks as low-cost biosorbent for atrazine removal, Environmental Technology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1653381
4.    Yavari, S., Malakahmad, A., Sapari, N. B., & Yavari, S., 2016, Sorption-desorption mechanisms of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides on biochars produced from agricultural wastes, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(4): 3981–3989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.003
5.    Ioannidou, O. A., Zabaniotou, A. A., Stavropoulos, G. G., Islam, M. A., & Albanis, T. A., 2010, Preparation of activated carbons from agricultural residues for pesticide adsorption, Chemosphere, 80(11): 1328–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.06.044
6.    Ayranci, E., & Hoda, N., 2005, Adsorption kinetics and isotherms of pesticides onto activated carbon-cloth, Chemosphere, 60(11): 1600–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.040
7.    Coldebella, P. F., Fagundes-Klen, M. R., Nishi, L., Valverde, K. C., Cavalcanti, E. B., Andreo dos Santos, O. A., & Bergamasco, R., 2017, Potential effect of chemical and thermal treatment on the Kinetics, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies for atrazine biosorption by the Moringa oleifera pods, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 95(5): 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22756
8.    Derylo-Marczewska, A., Blachnio, M., Marczewski, A. W., Seczkowska, M., & Tarasiuk, B., 2019, Phenoxyacid pesticide adsorption on activated carbon – Equilibrium and kinetics, Chemosphere, 214: 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.088
9.    Hameed, B. H., Salman, J. M., & Ahmad, A. L., 2009, Adsorption isotherm and kinetic modeling of 2,4-D pesticide on activated carbon derived from date stones, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(1): 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.069
10. Kurtoğlu, A. E., & Atun, G., 2016, Competitive adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide and humic acid onto activated carbon for agricultural water management, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(53): 25653–25666. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1156027
11. Adeniyi, A. G., Ighalo, J. O., & Odetoye, T. E., 2020, Response surface modelling and optimisation of biodiesel production from Avocado plant (Persea americana) oil, Indian Chemical Engineer, 62(3): 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00194506.2019.1658546
12. de Souza, F. M., dos Santos, O. A. A., & Vieira, M. G. A., 2019, Adsorption of herbicide 2,4-D from aqueous solution using organo-modified bentonite clay, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(18): 18329–18342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05196-w
13. Essandoh, M., Wolgemuth, D., Pittman, C. U., Mohan, D., & Mlsna, T., 2017, Adsorption of metribuzin from aqueous solution using magnetic and nonmagnetic sustainable low-cost biochar adsorbents, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(5): 4577–4590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8188-6
14. Essandoh, M., Wolgemuth, D., Pittman, C. U., Mohan, D., & Mlsna, T., 2017, Phenoxy herbicide removal from aqueous solutions using fast pyrolysis switchgrass biochar, Chemosphere, 174: 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.105
15. Duman, O., Özcan, C., Gürkan Polat, T., & Tunç, S., 2019, Carbon nanotube-based magnetic and non-magnetic adsorbents for the high-efficiency removal of diquat dibromide herbicide from water: OMWCNT, OMWCNT-Fe3O4 and OMWCNT-κ-carrageenan-Fe3O4 nanocomposites, Environmental Pollution, 244: 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.071
16. Pinto, M. C. E., Santos, R. M. M., Gonçalves, R. G. L., Duarte, V. G. O., Borges, P. D., Leroux, F. Tronto, J., 2018, Adsorption of Dicamba herbicide onto a carbon replica obtained from a layered double hydroxide, Dalton Transactions, 47(9): 3119–3127. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7DT03720A
17. da Fonseca, R. J., Segatelli, M. G., Borges, K. B., & Tarley, C. R. T., 2015, Synthesis and evaluation of different adsorbents based on poly(methacrylic acid–trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate) and poly(vinylimidazole–trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate) for the adsorption of tebuthiuron from aqueous medium, Reactive and Functional Polymers, 93: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.05.004
18. Shafeeyan, M. S., Daud, W. M. A. W., Houshmand, A., & Shamiri, A., 2010, A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 89(2): 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.006
19. Adelodun, A. A., Kim, K.-H., Ngila, J. C., & Szulejko, J., 2015, A review on the effect of amination pretreatment for the selective separation of CO2, Applied Energy, 158: 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.107
20. Khuri, A. I., & Mukhopadhyay, S., 2010, Response surface methodology, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(2): 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.73
21. Hill, W. J., & Hunter, W. G., 1966, A review of response surface methodology: a literature survey, Technometrics, 8(4): 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1966.10490404
22. Adeniyi, A. G., & Ighalo, J. O., 2019, Biosorption of pollutants by plant leaves: An empirical review, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7(3): 103100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103100
23. Said, M. S. M., Ghani, J. A., Kassim, M. S., Tomadi, S. H., & Haron, C. H. C., 2013, Comparison between Taguchi method and response surface methodology (RSM) in optimizing machining condition, In Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Robust Quality Engineering, pp. 60–68. Retrieved from http://eprints.utem.edu.my/7716/1/ICRQE_2013.pdf
24. Widyaningsih, T. D., Widjanarko, S. B., Waziiroh, E., Wijayanti, N., & Maslukhah, Y. L., 2018, Pilot plant scale extraction of black cincau (Mesona palustris BL) using historical-data response surface methodology, International Food Research Journal, 25(2): 712–719. Retrieved from http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/25 (02) 2018/(38).pdf
25. Mahmoodi, N. M., Keshavarzi, S., & Rezaei, P., 2017, Synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticle and photocatalytic dye degradation study using response surface methodology (RSM) and genetic algorithm (GA), Desalination and Water Treatment, 72: 394–405. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20639
26. Abdel daiem, M. M., Rivera-Utrilla, J., Sánchez-Polo, M., & Ocampo-Pérez, R., 2015, Single, competitive, and dynamic adsorption on activated carbon of compounds used as plasticizers and herbicides, Science of The Total Environment, 537: 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.131
27. Kazak, O., Eker, Y. R., Akin, I., Bingol, H., & Tor, A., 2017, Green preparation of a novel red mud@carbon composite and its application for adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid from aqueous solution, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(29): 23057–23068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9937-x
28. Agarwal, S., Sadeghi, N., Tyagi, I., Gupta, V. K., & Fakhri, A., 2016, Adsorption of toxic carbamate pesticide oxamyl from liquid phase by newly synthesized and characterized graphene quantum dots nanomaterials, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 478: 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.06.029
29. Al Bahri, M., Calvo, L., Gilarranz, M. A., & Rodriguez, J. J., 2016, Diuron Multilayer Adsorption on Activated Carbon from CO 2 Activation of Grape Seeds, Chemical Engineering Communications, 203(1): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2014.934447
30. Ignatowicz, K., 2011, A mass transfer model for the adsorption of pesticide on coconut shell based activated carbon, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 54(23–24): 4931–4938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.005